Comments on: Diving Titan: Reviewing the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M in Black Ceramic

By: John Bormann

John Bormann — Thu, 18 Aug 2022 22:46:17 +0000

All your speaking points re: the buckle and yet no picture. Disappointing at best

By: Simon Rowlinson

Simon Rowlinson — Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:11:57 +0000

“This watch was first introduced as a steel model with a varnished dial, an ETA-based Omega Caliber 2500”

No it was not. The Cal.2500 was not introduced until 1999 and the Seamaster Professional was introduced in 1993. The watch was introduced with a Cal.1120 movement which is a Swiss lever escapement movement, not a Co-axial movement like the Cal.2500, based on the ETA 2892 ebauche. Please try to be accurate.

By: Danny Simenauer

Danny Simenauer — Thu, 01 Jul 2021 19:46:53 +0000

I own this watch with a blue wave dial on a steel bracelet and absolutely love it. It can also be a dress watch if you get it with rose gold accents. The watch is readily available and less expensive then the Rolex Submariner. Kudos to Omega!

By: Danny Simenauer

Danny Simenauer — Thu, 01 Jul 2021 19:41:20 +0000

I own the blue wave dial with a steel bracelet and absolutely love this watch. It is readily available and far less expensive then the Rolex Submariner. There are even dress models with rose gold accents that are stunning.

By: Gerry Dimatos

Gerry Dimatos — Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:26:38 +0000

To those who even dare compare an Omega to a Rolex – really ?
The problem with Omega as the article says is that it used ETA movements in this Seamaster and eventually now they make their own. Despite the strides that Omega has made in recent years – they are no Rolex and with the exception of the Speedmaster are lacking in visual identity and design. Rolex builds on its designs modifying them ever so slightly year on year so they have the highest brand recognition of any watch in the business.
The Seamaster is undoubtedly a good watch but it is no Submariner and not desired in the same way.