Comments on: Rare Oyster: Testing the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Submariner Date LV

By: SPQR

SPQR — Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:26:27 +0000

The rate results seem to confirm suspicions that the in-house Rolex “Superlative Chronometer” standard is marketing “puffery” as opposed to rigorous testing like the METAS Master Chronometer standard.

By: Gerry Diimatos

Gerry Diimatos — Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:33:34 +0000

I have said this many times. Rolex make a peerless product that really doesn’t have a competitor for what they make – however they are no longer in the retail business…

By: RKJ

RKJ — Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:17:19 +0000

In reply to Russell Dejulio. I agree. I'm also waiting for a 124060 that my AD has told be should be arriving soon. However, after reading > 4000 comments on issues (sometimes recurring multiple times with the same watch) with the 32xx movements, I am thinking of putting off the purchase until more info is available.

By: Russell Dejulio

Russell Dejulio — Sun, 24 Sep 2023 22:58:00 +0000

I planned to buy a Sub for my retirement and was on my AD’s list . I love my Rolex datejust which I Purchased new in 1984. It still looks and runs like new. However, I’ve I have read a lot on the Rolex forums about problems with this new movement losing time after 1 to 2 years of ownership so I decided to buy a Tudor Pelagos with a in House Movement and blue dial as an alternative. I doubt that watch time will take a deep dive into this, because I’m sure you don’t want to offend Rolex but I wish someone would look into this and find out if Rolex has or is going to address the issue

By: Jesse

Jesse — Tue, 27 Sep 2022 00:29:15 +0000

In reply to MARTIN W SCHWARTZ. You may be one of the 12% that disagrees but it’s just a matter of taste. I’ll take any of the three models if available with out hesitation.